Jump to content
The Classic Speaker Pages Discussion Forums

fedeleluigi

Members
  • Content Count

    144
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About fedeleluigi

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

2,500 profile views
  1. fedeleluigi

    Refoam AR-9 woofer

    Mez, That's Ok if the woofer is a replacement part manufactured by Tonegen. If the woofer is the original AR woofer (part number 200003), the outer edge of the foam is normally glued to a masonite ring that is glued to the metal frame. If someone erroneously removed the masonite ring you should restore it. Luigi
  2. You're welcome, Your measurements are very interesting! Please consider that 20 oz of fibergass could overdamp the late 200003 woofer generation (that is what I do hear with my ears but I never carried out measurements). To the best of my knowledge, AR 11 and 10 Pi MKII did only use 10 oz of "white" polyester in USA. The same type of white polyester was also used for the AR9 and (later) the AR9ls series. In Europe different types (with different densities and consequently different masses) of polyester were used for the AR 11 and 10 Pi MKII and only the late production in 1979 used the "white" polyester (about 9 oz). I've read the AR 11 MKI review again but, unfortunately, they do not say how the switches were set during the impedance measurement. The frequency response shows 3 curves (0, -3, -6 dB). Since only the midrange and tweeter can be attenuated, the 3 curves are exactly the same up to about 500 Hz. So the minimum (4.8 Ohm) at 80 Hz is not affected by the midrange and tweeter switch position. The minimum around 3 Ohm at 6000-7000 Hz may suggest that the switches were set for the maximum output (0 db attenuation) and furthermore the worst condition is what generally matters most. Anyway, the minimum of 4.8 Ohm at 80 Hz would seem a little high in comparision with that of the AR 3a improved that had the same 200003 woofer generation used for the AR 11 MKI and a rather similar woofer low-pass crossover network. As regards the AR-10 Pi impedance measurements (both MKI and MKII), they say that the switches were set for the maximum output (4Pi, 0dB, 0dB for woofer, midrange and tweeter respectively). Examining the AR 10 Pi crossover network, when the woofer environmental control switch is set to obtain the maximum output (4Pi), the inductance in series with woofer is 4.73 mH (1.88 mH + 2.85 mH), the capacity in parallel is 100 uF and thanks to the autoransformer, the output voltage that supplies the woofer is higher than the input one. Because of the autotransformer the impedance varies according to switch positions: the review says that when the woofer switch is set on 2Pi and Pi the minimum impedance is 7.5 and 13.6 Ohm respectively (around 100 Hz) .
  3. From the AR drawings: AR 11 MKI : 20 oz fiberglass AR 11 MKII: 10 oz (white) polyester wadding . Several types (and weights to always obtain the optimal damping) of polyester stuffing were used in the European factories for the MKII versions. As regards the white one (used only in the very late production), I've generally found a single sheet of about 250g (8.82 oz). The 10 Pi MKII of the test (Fc: 40.5 Hz) had the multi-coloured poliester (in my experience i found about 450g =15.87 oz when this type of stuffing was used). In another magazine that also tested the 10 Pi MKII, the Fc was 42.8 Hz and the woofer Fs 16.9 Hz . The suffing was multi-coloured polyester too. As said in my previous post, unfortunately, I don't have any impedance graph (and Fc) for the AR 11 MKII but I think that its Fc is similar to that of the AR 10 MKII.
  4. From what I've read in your first post your AR-11's are MKII. I coudn't found an impedance sweep for the AR-11 MKII but I've found one for both the AR-11 MKI and the 10 Pi MKI . I've also found some measurements for the AR-10 Pi MKII that essentially differs from the 11 MKII for the use of an autotransformer in the crossover network whereas the cabinet volume and drivers are the same (AR-11 MKI schematic, AR-11 MKII schematic, AR 10 Pi MKI and MKII schematic) . The FC is 40.5 Hz for the AR-10 Pi MKII (besides the impedance sweep, see also the red highlighted text) and seems to be around 36-37 Hz and 38 Hz for the 10 Pi MKI and AR-11 MKI respectively. Hope these graphs can be useful to you.
  5. Examining the AR drawings in the library, the mass without foam measured by @aquila2010 for the 200003 woofer moving mass should probably be correct ( around 70 g). The drawing #002 is dated 8 Jan 1984 and reports a mass of 41 +/-3g for the cone/surround assembly. The drawing #004 (it seems to be dated 7/1/69 ) should show the first ferrite cone/surround assembly and its mass is exactly the same as before. In other words the mass of the cone/surround assembly should have not changed during the 200003-(0/1) woofer lifespan. The drawing #299 (12-in W // 200003 // voice coil // 25-Jan-80 // 13-Feb_81) refers to the aluminum voice coil and reports a mass of 24g +/- 15% (from 20.4 g to 27.6 g) . I coudn't find the spider and dust cap masses on their respective drawings. Therefore, without spider and dust cup, the mass of cone/surround/voice-coil assembly is about 41g+24g = 65 g (anyway it could ranges from 58.4g to 71.6g taking into account the maximum variations admitted in the AR drawings) for the aluminum-voice-coil woofer. Realistically the spider and dust cup and glue could have a total mass of around 5-10 g, so the "about 70 g" without foam reported by Aquila2010 is likely correct and probably applies to the aluminum-voice-coil woofer as well. Anyhow I've several 200003 woofers disassembled but haven't a very accurate scale at the moment. If I can somehow get one I'll report all their moving masses.
  6. fedeleluigi

    AR-11 MK1. Identification and rebuild.

    This tweeter is original (MKI) . This is a replecement tweeter probably made by Tonegen / Foster. Very likely it is more sensitive/efficient in comparison to the original tweeter.
  7. fedeleluigi

    AR-11 MK1. Identification and rebuild.

    Here is an interesting thread about the masonite ring. Unfortunately I do think that you have to made it by yourself or with someone's help
  8. fedeleluigi

    AR-11 MK1. Identification and rebuild.

    JimEG, Unfortunately someone refoaming this woofer erroneously removed the "masonite" ring. You can see it on the other woofer: it is glued to the basket and the outer edge of the foam is glued to it . The masonite ring should be restored.
  9. fedeleluigi

    AR 11" woofer driver refoam (AR9)

    Pete what's exactly the problem with the woofer match?
  10. fedeleluigi

    AR 11" woofer driver refoam (AR9)

    No they haven't. As regards the 12" foam/ceramic woofers made from about 1970 to around 1977 I have always and only found paper formers, at least so far. So the AR 11/10pi MKI woofers have paper formers, the AR 11/10pi MKII and the following 12" woofers used in the 9 and 9LS series have aluminum formers. Luigi
  11. fedeleluigi

    Need help for AR-12 refurbish

    Keno, you could use not original tweeters but you have to adapt the driver flange to the cabinet hole and modify the crossover network. If you want to do a good job you should use a speaker simulation software and in the end carry out some measurements. Imho, If you don't want to do all this and wish to keep the AR 12 originality as far as possible, today the best option is to use the replacement tweeters supplied by Midwest Speaker Repair. The 8 Ohm version is the correct one for the AR 12. It's a drop in replacement tweeter and If you use the 8 Ohm version you do not have to modify anything. Some members of this forum have already used these replacement tweeters (the 4 Ohm version) for some restoration of 4 Ohm AR speakers. Luigi - https://www.midwestspeakerrepair.com/shop/home-audio/mw-audio-mt-4121-75-inch-dome-tweeter/ - https://www.ebay.com/itm/AR-Acoustic-Research-Replacement-8-ohm-Tweeter-for-AR-2ax-AR5-LST-2-MT-4121-8/162689351715?hash=item25e10a8023:g:k~kAAOSwc8lZzEo4
  12. fedeleluigi

    AR speaker measurements

    You can see AR-3a, 3a improved, Pi/One, LST, MST measurements on Library Additions and Corrections
  13. Risposta in frequenza in camera anecoica = Anechoic Response. It shows some irregularities especially at about 2500, 6000, 14000 Hz because of the destructive interferences at the microphone position caused by the use of 4 tweeters. See also the polar responses. Risposta in camera d'ascolto rilevata con "rumore rosa" attraverso filtri a terzi d'ottava = Room Response measured with pink noise through 1/3 Octave filters. Diagrammi polari = Polar Responses (note that they are not so regular. Unfortunately 4 tweeters cause a lot of constructive and destructive interferences. In other words, waves with the same frequency emitted by different drivers combine and add together or cancel depending on their phase at the point where they combine). Curva d'impedenza = Impedance Risposta ai transitori = Tone Bursts DISTORSIONE ARMONICA = ARMONIC DISTORTION at 90 and 95 dB ( the II and III armonic distortions are actually measured at 90 and 95 dB only at 500 Hz . At the other frequencies the real SPL depends on the frequency response of each loudspeaker); the tables show the III and II armonic distortion for all the loudspeakers tested in that issue of the magazine. Numbers out of parenthesis are III armonic distortion. Numbers in parenthesis are II armonic distortion. Vin= Voltage employed to obtain 90 and 95 dB at 500 Hz
  14. No anechoic response measurement was reported. Risposta in camera d'ascolto rilevata con "rumore rosa" attraverso filtri a terzi d'ottava = Room Response measured with pink noise through 1/3 Octave filters (switch position: 2) Diagrammi polari = Polar Responses (note that they are not so regular as 3a's. Unfortunately 4 tweeters and 4 midranges cause a lot of constructive and destructive interferences. In other words, waves with the same frequency emitted by different drivers combine and add together or cancel depending on their phase at the point where they combine). Curva d'impedenza = Impedance at different switch position (2 and 6) Risposta ai transitori = Tone Bursts
  15. Risposta in frequenza in camera anecoica = Anechoic Response Risposta in camera d'ascolto rilevata con "rumore rosa" attraverso filtri a terzi d'ottava = Room Response measured with pink noise through 1/3 Octave filters Diagrammi polari = Polar Responses Curva d'impedenza = Impedance Risposta ai transitori = Tone Bursts DISTORSIONE ARMONICA= ARMONIC DISTORTION at 90 and 95 dB (the II and III armonic distortions are actually measured at 90 and 95 dB only at 500 Hz. At the other frequencies the real SPL depends on the frequency response of each loudspeaker); the tables show the III and II armonic distortion for all the loudspeakers tested in that issue of the magazine. Numbers out of parenthesis are III armonic distortion. Numbers in parenthesis are II armonic distortion. Vin= Voltage employed to obtain 90 and 95 dB at 500 Hz
×